Having spent the interim between lunch and the theatre
exploring Angel, having some frozen yogurt, and a glass of wine or two in a
very cosy local pub, we made our way over to Southbank for the main event!
Despite being a self-professed Shakespeare lover, much to my
shame I have never visited The Globe before – so by the time this weekend
finally came round I was ridiculously excited. The Globe does not stick out in
the modern London cityscape as I thought it would – as you walk further along
Southbank it seamlessly transforms into Shakespeare-land, with statues and
signs featuring the likes of Francis Bacon, so that when you approach The
Globe, it just feels natural.
After having a little look around the shop (a little,
chilled wander for Angus, a rather too excitable dash around for me) we made
our way into the grounds surrounding the actual theatre. Angus had opted for standing tickets, said to
be the best way to see a play there, so we took on our roles of Shakespearean groundlings
and queued up outside the doors. Once in, we established a great place almost
right at the front, definitely within touching distance of the actors (not that
I would EVER do that…). My worries of some sort of Shakespeare induced mosh pit
full of pushy punters were quickly diminished, everyone was very polite and
chilled out and we had more than enough space to enjoy the performance.
The performance began with an eerie drum performance
followed by the witches’ first scene. Far from the scraggly old Scottish women
in decrepit pointy hats that has so often been the image of Macbeth, these
three were beautiful and strong young women – and funny too. Their sexuality
was both emphasised and subverted to make fools of the egotistical military
heroes such as Macbeth and Banquo, who they fundamentally control. The presence
of these three women throughout the play on the balcony above the stage, hiding
around pillars on the stage, or orchestrating a song, really highlighted their
role as the puppet masters of the action.
Macbeth himself was not only extremely easy to look at,
charming, handsome, rugged…I could go on…but he was also strikingly modern.
Technically nothing had been updated about the performance, they were all in
traditional dress, they used Shakespeare’s script word for word, it wasn’t one
of those contemporary interpretations – but that’s what made me realise:
Shakespeare doesn’t NEED updating. His pure words performed on a stage speak to
an eternal audience, unbound by geography, gender, class or time. The
performance showed me that a single phrase featured in the middle of a long
speech which is easy to skim over or dismiss as just a linguistic product of
its time can actually be one of the most crucial lines of the play – conveying
precisely what the character is about and how this relates to us the audience.
Sadly it’s impossible to describe every part of the play –
but a couple of parts really stood out, on top of what I’ve already mentioned. The
Globe is, and always has been, an open air theatre (luckily the weather held
out for us), in the majority of Shakespearean or other Renaissance plays there
are numerous references to the weather and the heavens, at which point it was
likely the actors would gesture to the sky – jokes about the elements or the
technicalities of the stage were common and popular. However, in this
production, this tradition was updated. Throughout the performance there were
planes flying over, muting the actors’ words, and a particularly endearing and unexpected
moment was when Macbeth actually referenced the inconvenience of this during
one of his speeches. The pure unpredictability and accidental nature of this
little addition was just another one of those nice aspects that brings you
closer to the actors and their performance, and reminds you of the universality
of the theatre.
Now, ghosts can be a bit of a taboo with regards to
Shakespeare. I’ve learnt throughout my education that everyone has their own
preference of how a ghost should be presented, from being physically on the
stage to speaking off stage to the modern fashion of video footage and sound
effects. I’m not hugely fussed about it - as long as it goes with the tone of
the performance and there isn’t a madman in a white sheet running around the
stage, it’s fine by me. Despite my lack of preference, I reckon Banquo’s ghost
scene would have satisfied most fussy customers. His physical presence made the
scene both terrifyingly haunting and hilarious at the same time. Banquo remained
silent for the entire scene, merely following Macbeth around as he erratically
leapt over chairs and scrambled around the dining table. The on-stage presence
of the ghost made the scene all the more comic as the audience could see what
the on-lookers could not – what was causing Macbeth to act so insanely - but his
constant eye contact with Macbeth equally hinted that it could indeed all be in
his head. This combination of comic and sinister devices, the stark contrast
between Macbeth’s slapstick hysteria and Banquo’s eerie silence, encapsulated
the entire performance for me. Not only did this production deliver the genre-defying
plot and techniques that I feel so define the genius of Shakespeare, but they
brought it to life in a modern context, without actually BRINGING it into a
modern context – it proved that four centuries on, Shakespeare can still be
enjoyed, and refreshed, by all.
Sadly, we caught one of the last performances, but The Globe are constantly showing great performances, I would go every week if I could! Find tickets for the latest shows here
Sounds so good, I want to go to The Globe and be a Shakespearean Groundling even more now! I love your photos too xx
ReplyDelete